Randel Law, Inc., Your Business and Succession Planning Lawyer as well as Corporate Transparency Compliance

Corporate and Securities Law Attorney Focusing on Helping Businesses Obtain Liquidity and Transition to New Ownership Through Exit and Succession Planning as well as Comply with the Corporate Transparency Compliance Act

Home

  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About
    • Our Practical Approach
  • Contact

SEC Simplifies Private Offering Compliance

January 31, 2021 By Rick Randel

Rick Randel Buy-Sell Agreements

Last November, the SEC adopted some significant regulations intended to simplify and harmonize the framework of rules allowing for offerings of securities (e.g. stock) to qualify for an exemption from registration (a “private offering” or “private placement”).  In addition to reducing the complexity and confusion of the current framework, the SEC believes the amendments will expand investment opportunities and promote companies’ access to capital.  The highlights include:

  • Establishing clearer rules for when issuers move from one exemption to another, and when two otherwise separate offerings should be treated as one offering for securities law purposes (aka “integration”).
  • Raising the offering limits: 
    • Regulation A Tier 2 to $75 million, and $22.5 million for secondary sales;
    • Regulation Crowdfunding to $5 million; and
    • Rule 504 offerings to $10 million.
  • Amending the individual investment limits for investors in crowdfunding offerings by removing investment limits for accredited investors, and revising the calculation of investment limits for non-accredited investors.
  • Formalizing rules governing certain offering communications, including permitting certain ‘test-the-waters’ and ‘demo day’ activities.
  • Aligning provisions and requirements around disclosures, eligibility requirements and bad actor disqualifications. 

For a link to the SEC’s release announcing the new rules, click here.

The new rules are scheduled to become effective on March 15, 2021.  However, as is standard practice for incoming administrations, the Biden administration has placed a “regulatory freeze” on regulations passed late in the previous administration.   In most cases the regulations eventually go forward, but these new SEC rules were somewhat controversial in that many observers (including the now acting Chair of the SEC) felt they unduly relaxed compliance requirements, therefore increasing the possibility of fraud. 

Regulations that have passed a certain point in the process of going final are not actually frozen; rather, the new administration has merely asked the relevant agency to consider postponing their implementation.  The new SEC rules described above fall within this category.  The SEC has not yet announced whether it will postpone the implementation of the above rules, but given the acting Chair’s and others’ opposition to the changes, there’s an excellent chance they will be postponed, possibly indefinitely.

Watch this space for further developments. 

Rick

This article is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter. You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Securities Law Tagged With: crowd-funding, Private Offering, Private Placement, San Francisco, san francisco securities law, San Ramon, SEC Compliance, Walnut Creek

SEC Updates Definition of Accredited Investor

September 16, 2020 By Rick Randel

Rick Randel Buy-Sell Agreements

Most of us have heard the term “accredited investor”.  Being accredited gives an investor access to a wider array of potential investments, because many of the exemptions from SEC registration are available only to offerings to accredited investors.  The SEC recently amended the definition of accredited investor by:

  • Adding new categories of individuals to the definition of accredited investor.
  • Expanding the list of business entities that qualify as an accredited investor.
  • Adopting other modifications to the accredited investor definition and related rules.

New Categories of Individuals

Previously only directors, executive officers, or general partners of the issuer, and investors with a net worth of $1,000,000 or annual income of $200,000, qualified as accredited investors (interestingly, although there have been calls to adjust for inflation the dollar amounts that qualify an individual as an accredited investor, those dollar amounts were left unchanged).

The amendments added additional categories of individuals who qualify as accredited investors, including people who hold certain professional certifications.  Only certifications specifically designated as qualifying by an SEC order will qualify.  A list of all certifications, designations, and credentials recognized by the SEC as qualifying will be published on the SEC’s website.  Initially, the following certifications qualify an individual as an accredited investor:

  • Licensed General Securities Representative (Series 7).
  • Licensed Investment Adviser Representative (Series 65).
  • Licensed Private Securities Offerings Representative (Series 82).

The SEC is expected to designate additional certifications, designations, and other credentials in the future.

The SEC also added “knowledgeable employees” of private funds to the definition of accredited investor for the purposes of investing in the fund they work for. 

Additional Types of Business Entities

The SEC expanded the list of business entities that qualify as an accredited investor to include:

  • Most registered investment advisers.
  • Limited liability companies (LLCs) and other noncorporate entities that:
    • have total assets in excess of $5 million; and
    • were not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities being offered.
  • Family offices and family clients that meet certain conditions.

Other Amendments

The SEC made the following additional changes to the definition of accredited investor:

  • Spousal Equivalents. For the purposes of pooling finances to qualify as accredited investors under the joint net worth or annual income tests, the SEC added the term “spousal equivalent” and defined it as “a cohabitant occupying a relationship generally equivalent to that of a spouse.”
  • Joint Net Worth.  The calculation of “joint net worth” can now aggregate the net worth of an investor and his or her spouse or spousal equivalent, but the securities being purchased by an investor relying on the joint net worth test need not be purchased jointly.
  • Entity with Accredited Owners.  While a business entity has always qualified as an accredited investor if all of its equity owners are accredited investors, the SEC has now clarified that, in determining accredited investor status, one may look through forms of equity ownership to natural persons.

I hope these changes allow you or some of your clients to invest in companies they may not have previously been able to.  Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 

This article is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter. You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Securities Law Tagged With: Accredited Investor, business entities, individual investors, SEC, SEC amendments, SEC Compliance, SEC registration

“Finders Keepers”

May 17, 2016 By Rick Randel

Raising Capital California Finder Law Requirements Securities Rick Randel San Francisco Bay Area Securities LawDoes this sound familiar?  XYZ Company is raising capital.  XYZ hires Jenna, a well-connected individual in her community, to locate investors.  She introduces the company to some affluent investors and helps facilitate the deal.  XYZ pays her a finder’s fee.

Is Jenna acting as a broker-dealer without a license?  Probably. Could the SEC or the California Department of Business Oversight fine her?  Probably.

Even worse, her acting as a broker-dealer without a license gives the investors the right to ask for their money back.

Just a Finder?

But she was “just a finder,” the Company says, not a broker-dealer! This is a common myth in the business community.  Companies think they can hire someone to find investors and pay them a finder’s fee, and if their business card and website don’t actually say “broker-dealer,” then they are “just a finder” and not a broker-dealer.  Wrong.  Whether someone is acting as a broker-dealer depends on what they do, not what their business card says.  And while there has always been an exemption from broker-dealer licensing for someone who is a “true finder,” what it means to be a “true finder” has always been a gray area and difficult to prove.  Until now.

The California legislature recently added Section 25206.1 to the California Corporations Code, defining the term “finder” and allowing people who jump through its hoops to avoid the requirement to register as a broker-dealer (at least under California law).

The requirements to comply with Section 25206.1 are numerous, but much less onerous than registering as a broker-dealer.  And if the requirements allow the person to collect a finder’s fee (and the company to comply with the securities laws), they are probably worth it.

The New California Finder Law Requirements

  • The finder must be a natural person, not an entity.
  • The transaction must take place in California.
  • The size of the transaction for which the finder is engaged must not exceed $15 million in the aggregate.
  • The finder must not: (a) participate in negotiating any of the terms of the transaction, (b) advise any party regarding the value of the securities or the advisability of purchasing or selling in the securities, (c) conduct any due diligence for any party to the transaction, (d) sell any securities that are owned directly or indirectly by the finder, (e) receive possession or custody of any funds in the transaction, (f) participate in the transaction unless it is qualified by permit or exempt from qualification under California law, (g) make any disclosure to any potential purchaser of securities other than: (i) the name, address and contact information of the issuer; (ii) the name, type, price, and aggregate amount of the securities offered; (iii) the issuer’s industry, location and years in business.
  • The finder must file, in advance of taking any finder’s fees, a statement of information with the finder’s name and address, together with a $300 filing fee, with the California Bureau of Business Oversight, and thereafter file annual renewal statements with a $275 filing fee and representations that the finder has complied with the exemption conditions.
  • The finder must obtain a written agreement signed by the finder, the issuer and the person introduced by the finder, disclosing: (a) the type and amount of compensation that has been or will be paid to the finder, (b) that the finder is not providing advice to the issuer or any person introduced to the issuer as to the value of the securities or advisability of purchasing or selling them, (c) whether the finder is also an owner of the securities being sold, (d) any conflict of interest in connection with the finder’s activities, (e) that the parties have the right to pursue any available remedies for breach of the agreement, and (f) a representation by the investor that the investor is an “accredited investor” as defined in SEC Regulation D and consents to the payment of the finder’s fee.
  • The finder must preserve copies of the notice, the written agreement and all other records relating to the transaction for a period of five years.

SEC Compliance

Note that the SEC has yet to jump on the finder bandwagon.  And individuals must comply with both state and federal law in securities transactions.  So even if a finder complies with Section 25206.1 in California, she could still find the SEC breathing down her neck for acting as a broker-dealer without a license.  However, if she complies with Section 25206.1, there is a good chance she will be deemed to be acting as a “true finder” and not a broker-dealer.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the new finder law.

 

This article is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter.  You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Broker-Dealer, Finder, Raising Capital, Securities Law Tagged With: California Finder Law Requirements, financing securities, Finder Law, funding securities, raising capital in silicon valley, raising capital in the san francisco bay area, SEC Compliance

Randel Law, Inc.
111 Deerwood Road, Suite 200
San Ramon, CA 94583
ph: (925) 855-3215
fax: (925) 855-3216

rick@randellaw.com

 

  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

© 2026 Randel Law, Inc. All rights reserved.