Randel Law, Inc., Your Business and Succession Planning Lawyer as well as Corporate Transparency Compliance

Corporate and Securities Law Attorney Focusing on Helping Businesses Obtain Liquidity and Transition to New Ownership Through Exit and Succession Planning as well as Comply with the Corporate Transparency Compliance Act

Home

  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About
    • Our Practical Approach
  • Contact

Legal Alert: Corporate Transparency Act court ruling

May 9, 2024 By Rick Randel

Rick Randel Mergers and Acquisitions and Succession Plans for Financial Advisers

Updating my recent post on the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), many of you may have heard that a federal court in Alabama recently ruled that the CTA is unconstitutional. The National Small Business Association (NSBA) and one of its members sued for an injunction prohibiting FinCEN from enforcing the CTA. The court ruled that the CTA is unconstitutional because it exceeds the constitution’s limits on Congress’s authority.

Many people think the court’s ruling means they don’t have to file reports under the CTA. However, the court’s ruling is limited to the plaintiffs in that case. FinCEN has appealed the decision and announced that all other companies subject to the CTA are still required to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports. You can find FinCEN’s announcement here. 

So if you are not a member of the NSBA, prudent practice is to comply with the CTA. This means filing a BOI report within ninety days after forming any new entity, and filing a BOI report by 12/31/24 for any entity that was in existence on 12/31/23.  Feel free to contact me if you need any help filing your report or have any questions regarding whether you are exempt from the CTA.

I will continue to monitor this situation and keep you updated. Thanks,

Rick Randel

This post is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter. You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Corporate Notices and Communications Tagged With: BOI reports, corporate transparency act Alabama, corporate transparency act update, CTA Alabama, Do I have to file reports under the CTA?, FinCEN, National Small Business Association and corporate transparency act

Corporate Transparency Act

December 6, 2023 By Rick Randel

Rick Randel Corporate Transparency Act

In October of 2022, I sent out an early warning that Congress had adopted the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which will require small, privately held companies to report information about their ownership to the federal government. Because the CTA takes effect on January 1, 2024, I thought now would be a good time for a reminder and some updates about the CTA. You can see my earlier post here.

The agency enforcing the CTA is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network or FinCEN. Initially FinCEN stated that companies formed on or after January 1, 2024, would have thirty calendar days after formation to file their initial BOI (beneficial owner information) report with FinCEN. More recently, FinCEN extended the reporting deadline from thirty days to ninety days. Companies in existence on 12/31/23 will still have until 1/1/25 to file their initial BOI report.

Although there have been some lawsuits filed to prevent FinCEN from enforcing the CTA as unconstitutional, the prudent course of action is to assume those challenges will not succeed. Here is a short list of the actions you should be considering:

• Determine whether your company is required to file BOI reports
• Alert your clients and contacts about this new requirement
• Rewrite your corporate documents (and tell your clients to rewrite theirs) so that investors/owners/officers/directors agree to provide the required information to the company (and any changes thereto), and consent to the company submitting that information to FinCEN
• If you or any of your clients invest in or are an officer or director of numerous companies, consider obtaining a “FinCEN Identifier” so you only have to provide your sensitive information one time directly to FinCEN, and not to every company in which they hold shares or are an officer or director.
• If you hear someone talking about forming a new company in the next few months, tell them to consider forming the entity by 12/31/23 to buy an additional year before they have to file their first BOI report (but synch up with their tax advisor to avoid triggering a tax filing or payment for 2023).

Click here to go to FinCEN’s landing page for the Corporate Transparency Act, where you can find further links to useful information such as FAQ’s and a compliance guide. For a more complete summary of the CTA, see the following outline:

What it is:

The Corporate Transparency Act (part of the Anti-money Laundering Act of 2020), a law passed by the United States Congress to prevent drug dealers, terrorists, and other bad actors from laundering their ill-gotten gains in the U.S. by hiding behind shell companies. The law requires small, privately held companies to report “beneficial ownership information” (BOI).

Who enforces it:

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the Department of the Treasury.

Which entities must file reports:

Basically any legal entity formed by filing articles or a similar document with a Secretary of State or similar agency (e.g. corporations, LLCs, and limited partnerships). However, 23 types of entities are exempt from filing BOI reports, including:

• Publicly traded companies
• Highly regulated companies e.g. investment advisers, broker-dealers, insurance companies, banks, etc.
• Tax-exempt entities e.g. 501(c)(3)s
• Privately held companies that have:
(a) Over 20 FT employees in the US
(b) More than $5,000,000 annual revenue, AND
(c) A physical office in the US.

Note it’s the entity itself that must file BOI reports with FinCEN, not the individuals whose information is being reported.

When reports must be filed:

• Entities already in existence on 12/31/23: by 1/1/25
• Entities formed on or after 1/1/24: 90 days after formation
• All entities: within 30 days after a change in previously reported information (including addition of a new individual who must be reported)

Individuals who must be included in the report:

  1. Any individual who exercises “substantial control” over the entity, including:
    • Senior Officers (probably includes managers of most LLCs)
    • Anyone who controls the appointment of senior officers or election of a majority of the board (note members of the board of directors are not specifically included)
    • Anyone who directs, determines, or has substantial influence over important decisions made by the entity (which probably does include directors of most small companies)
  2. Any individual who owns or controls 25% or more of the entity:
    • There are extensive rules regarding what counts as an ownership interest and how to calculate the percentage. Non-voting stock is counted. Unexercised options are counted.
    • Only individuals are to be reported, whether they own their stock directly in the reporting entity or indirectly through a parent entity. Parent entities are not reported. But if an individual owns stock in a parent entity that indirectly adds up to over 25% of the reporting entity, he or she has to be included in the report. For example, individuals A and B in the below diagram would be reported, but neither parent nor individual C or D would be reported:
Corporate Transparency Act

3. For entities formed after 12/31/23, any “Company Applicant”, which means any individual who:
• directly filed the document that created the entity; or
• was primarily responsible for directing or controlling the filing of the document that created the entity.
The regulations are unclear for many scenarios (this is another reason to consider forming a new entity prior to 12/31/23).

Information that must be reported:

• The individual’s full legal name
• Date of birth
• Home address (their residence, not their office)
• Unique identifying number from passport, driver’s license or similar government ID
• An image of that document (i.e. a pdf or jpeg)

FinCEN is required to keep the information confidential and only use it for its own law enforcement purposes or only disclose to specified other law enforcement agencies for specified purposes.

An alternative is for individuals who anticipate being included on many different entities’ BOI reports to go directly on FinCEN, submit the information only one time, and obtain a “FinCEN Identifier” to provide to each entity, rather than giving their home address and a picture of their driver’s license or passport to numerous entities.

How to file reports:

• Online in a portal being set up by FinCEN
• Format initially proposed by FinCEN was highly criticized
• FinCEN working on a new format

Penalties for willful failure to file or filing incorrect information:

• Monetary fine of up to $10,000
• imprisonment for up to two years, or
• both

Resources:

FinCEN website: https://www.fincen.gov/boi

FinCEN FAQs: https://www.fincen.gov/boi-faqs

FinCEN fact sheet: https://www.fincen.gov/beneficial-ownership-information-reporting-rule-fact-sheet

FinCEN compliance guide: https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/BOI_Small_Compliance_Guide_FINAL_Sept_508C.pdf

This post is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter. You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Corporate Notices and Communications Tagged With: Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, Beneficial Ownership Information, BOI Reporting, Corporate Transparency Act, FinCEN, US Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

New Company Ownership Reporting Requirement

October 21, 2022 By Rick Randel

Rick Randel New Company Ownership Reporting

 

Companies have always been required to report information regarding their officers and directors.  They have never had to report information about their owners.

Until now.  (Well, soon.)    

Last month the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued the final version of its rules requiring small privately held businesses to report information about their owners under the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021.  According to FinCen, the rule is “designed to protect U.S. national security and strengthen the integrity and transparency of the U.S. financial system, [by helping] to stop criminal actors, including oligarchs, kleptocrats, drug traffickers, human traffickers, and those who would use anonymous shell companies to hide their illicit proceeds.”

Almost all small, privately held businesses in corporate, LLC, or limited partnership form will be required to report the names of their stockholders, members or partners (it’s the business that files the report, not the individuals).  There are many exemptions, including companies in highly regulated industries, publicly traded companies, and companies that have all three of the following: (1) twenty or more employees, (2) over $5,000,000 in annual revenue, and (3) an operating presence at a physical office within the U.S.  As FinCen states in the press release adopting the rule: “The rule will require most corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities created in or registered to do business in the United States to report information about their beneficial owners”.

Not all owners must be reported.  Only individuals who own 25% or more of the company or exercise “substantial control” over the company must be reported.  Not surprisingly, there are complicated rules to determine percentage ownership, including indirect ownership or “look through” rules.  The term “substantial control” has a broad definition and includes being a director or senior officer, having the power to elect or appoint senior officers or a majority of the board of directors, or otherwise having substantial influence over important decisions within the company.

The report must name the above individuals and include their date of birth, address, and an identifying number from a driver’s license, passport or similar document as well as a copy of that document.  FinCen is still working on the system (presumably online) by which the ownership reports will be filed.

Companies currently in existence or formed any time through December 31, 2023 have until January 1, 2025 to file their first report.  Companies formed on January 1, 2024 or after have 30 days after formation to file their report.  All companies must file an updated report within 30 days after any change to, or discovering any inaccuracy in, the information previously reported. 

There are penalties of up to $10,000 per occurrence or up to two years in jail for willful failure to comply with the reporting requirement.

The good news is that the information won’t be publicly available.  In most cases, it will only be available to FinCen itself and certain law enforcement agencies that will be required to keep it confidential.  However, the reporting obligation alone will be a significant administrative burden on small, privately held companies.  Owners of small businesses should mark their calendars for mid-2024 to start preparing to file their required report no later than December 31, 2024.

For more information about the ownership reporting requirements, click here for a link to FinCen’s fact sheet on the new rule.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.  Thanks,

Rick

 

This article is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter. You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Corporate Notices and Communications Tagged With: Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, Beneficial Ownership Information, BOI Reporting, company ownership reporting requirement, corporate ownership reporting, Corporate Transparency Act, FinCEN, US Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Are Electronic Signatures Valid?

March 11, 2017 By Rick Randel

Are Electronic Signatures Valid Legal Virtual Contracts  Rick Randel San Francisco Bay Area LawyerIn the old days contracts were printed on paper, signed with “wet ink”, and kept in a physical file for safekeeping. Now we’ve progressed to pdf’s. In most cases this means one party emails the contract and the other person has to print the signature page, sign it, scan it, and email it back.

Is there an easier way?

Could the receiving person just type in their signature without printing the document? Or better yet, could he or she just reply by email and say “I accept”?

The answer is basically yes. Thanks to some developments in the law, and subject to certain exceptions, virtually any medium in which two parties indicate the terms of their agreement and their intent to be legally bound, is valid. You can type in your signature, paste in a jpeg of your signature, check a box indicating that you accept the terms, or simply email back “I accept” or “confirmed”.

The Virtual Contract

However, when two private parties enter into a contract (as opposed to one shopper buying something online), I still recommend something pretty close to the old-fashioned contract. It doesn’t necessarily have to be printed on paper and wet-signed in ink, but it should be a document with four corners (perhaps in pdf) with a title, the terms, and signature blocks at the end. You don’t want to walk into court with a print-out of an email swirl and have to convince the court the other party agreed to the terms, ask the court to figure out what those terms are, and enforce them. You want to walk in with a traditional looking document that states the terms of the agreement and is either signed at the bottom or has some other clear indication of assent from both parties.

So how do we do that without having to print the signature page, sign it, and scan it? One option is a virtual contracting service like DocuSign, Adobe Sign (formerly EchoSign) or HelloSign. Another option is for each party to either paste in an electronic version of their signature (many software tools will perform this function) or just type their name into the Word document and save it as a pdf. Not quite as good but probably valid would be for one party to email the contract as an attachment, each party email that they accept the contract, and then save the emails in the same pdf as the (unsigned) contract. In the latter cases, you would want to insert a clause into the contract itself whereby the parties agree to conduct the transaction by electronic means and that electronic signatures have the same effect as manual.

Note there are exceptions to the kinds of documents that can be signed this way. You can’t do this with wills, codicils or testamentary trusts, secured promissory notes, security agreements (granting another party a lien on collateral of the signing party), documents regarding divorce, adoption, or other family law matters, official court documents, etc.

Corporate Notices and Communications

For those of you who have shareholders and boards of directors, you may sometimes wonder if there is a better way to advise them of upcoming meetings than sending them paper notices by snail mail. Or if there is a better way of getting board resolutions signed than making your directors print documents, sign them, scan them, and email them back. The answer is yes. If you make certain amendments to your bylaws and get everyone to sign a consent form, you can send shareholders meeting notices by email. You can also describe the board resolutions in an email and ask your directors to simply reply “I consent” without having to print anything. Feel free to reach out to me if you are interested in setting this up.

 

This article is not intended and should not be relied upon as legal or tax advice pertaining to any specific matter.  You are encouraged to seek competent legal and tax counsel before proceeding with any transaction involving any of the matters discussed above.

Filed Under: Corporate Notices and Communications, Electronic Signatures, Virtual Contracts Tagged With: Are Electronic Signatures Valid?, Board Resolutions by Email, Business Contract, Corporate Legal Signature, Corporate Notices and Communications, Electronic Signature, Sending Shareholders Notices by Email, Virtual Contract

Randel Law, Inc.
111 Deerwood Road, Suite 200
San Ramon, CA 94583
ph: (925) 855-3215
fax: (925) 855-3216

rick@randellaw.com

 

  • Home
  • Services
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

© 2026 Randel Law, Inc. All rights reserved.